Bloodstain

In Bloodstain, Christopher W. Rowan portrays the theme very effectively. The theme teaches how a insufficiency of obligation can negatively affect more than peerless individual. This theme is represented by the actions of the main character, Fred, as well(p) as his p arnts, and Mr. Haskell, the unfortunate victim.         Rowans theme of ir right is expressed almost clearly through the behavior of the protagonist, Fred. The initial incident is Freds coarse decision to take his parents particle accelerator. With the familiarity that they would non be go home soon, he underhandedly sneaks the weapon forth into the constraining forest. Once he is there, he carelessly acts come to the fore an adventure, entirely oblivious to the fact that the hammers on the accelerator are cocked; the natural gas is ready to fire. When he sees what he thinks is a rabbit, he impulsively fires at it. In addition, after his frightening discovery, Fred thoughtlessl y flees the panorama instead of making any attempt to save Mr. Haskell. anterior the accident, Freds intense determination to hide the truth is illustrated clearly with this reference: Ill never tell, he told himself. Theyll never even suspect me. It is quite a a evident that most of the responsibility in this topographic point belongs to Fred.         Furthermore, Freds parents need of responsibility in instanter contributes to Mr. Haskells death. Their first act of indifference is when they give out to assert the gun locked up in a safer place. Instead, they keep it in a location where it is comfortably accessible to Fred. equally important, Freds parents dont suspect anything unusual when he doesnt witness Mr. Haskells funeral. They merely include his somewhat transparent excuse; he just claims that the view is too sad. When Freds female parent notices his hurt index experience, she asks, Whats the matter with your finger? Youve been d oing that for 2 or 3 days. Fred replies wit! h another poor excuse, which his mother readily accepts without further questioning. This is merely another instance where she shows oversight towards her sons life. Freds parents are not at once responsible for this tragedy; nevertheless, they quiet contribute to the situation considerably.         Lastly, the responsibility of this disaster ironically waterfall upon Mr. Haskell as well. Despite his knowledge of Freds reckless behavior, he neglects to be his conduct.

Upon encountering Fred in the forest, Mr. Haskell takes the gun away only to uncock both of the hammers. later on doing so, he ignorantly hands it back to him, apparently treating the situation lightl y. At this point, he knows that Fred is not capable of handling a firearm safely; however, Mr. Haskell does not reprimand his for this. Next, he asks Fred, family line know you got that blunderbuss out? Fred replies, No sir, and Mr. Haskell playfully cuffs his ear, apparently not seeing the conditional relation of this fact. He has now learned that the gun is stolen, but he does not take the situation seriously. Instead, he mildly warns him not to shoot anybodys cow, and then leaves. Consequently, his casual attempt to the matter results in his unfortunate death.         In conclusion, in a disastrous event, responsibility is often shared. In Bloodstain, Freds actions are what directly leads to Mr. Haskells death; however, his parents and Mr. Haskell himself are also to blame for the tragic bend of events. If you want to birth a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information abou! t our service, visit our page: How it works.