There are at least three ways which egest a representative or a senator to balloting for or against a bill or amendment: representational, organizational and attitudinal. Representational is found on the assumption that members want to get re-elected and in that respectfore take to please their constituents. Organizational is establish on the assumption that since to the highest degree constituents dont know how their senator voted, it is not essential to please them. But it is master(prenominal) to please fellow members of social intercourse. The attitudinal is based on the assumption that there are so many conflicting pressures on members of Congress that they cancel one another out, leaving them virtually justify to vote on the basis of their have got beliefs.
The representational understand has merit under special circumstances, like when the constituents devote a clear view on some issue and a legislators vote on that issue will draw more than attention. For instance, a legislator from a highly black district wont vote against a civil rights bill for minorities, while representatives with mostly non-minority (white) voters in their district can vote whichever way they please on the issue. Foreign policy is generally remote from the daily pursual of most Americans and the public changes trusts on it rather rapidly. The constituents and the legislator vote other than for the most part on foreign policy. When an issue arouses chummy passion among voters, it is necessary for the legislator to go in accordance with the legal age constituents, despite his or her personal convictions if he or she wants to be re-elected. The general problem with representational explanation is that public opinion is not strong and clear on most measures on which the Congress votes.
Many representatives and senators face constituencies that are divided on key issues.
The organizational view deals more with legislators voting in accordance to cues...
The shory essay comes with a good introduction, which tells us three main reasons how the representatives vote.
The elaboration is clear, too. but if more examples are included, and have explained which of the three theories is more important, or much more based on by senators, it would be better.
also, I want to push a question:
How would they senators vote if the will of the people contradicts the senators own moral judgement?
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.