12 Angry Men

12 angry MenGrand canon University Introduction: In the movie 12 Angry Men an eighteen year old son is charged with the murder of his father. At first, all of the twelve jurywomans conceptualize that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, turn out for one, who entrusts that they owe the male child to a greater extent than five minutes in deciding if he lives or non. The gay who does not believe that the boy is guilty explains his views to the hiatus of the jurors and is ridiculed by them. An old man afterward sees where he is spill with his reasoning and when the next suffrage is done, he also votes innocent. The jurors hide to discuss the case and demand up some authorized facts in favor of the teenager. Gradually, new(prenominal) jurors sire to change their minds, and the ones that do not become outraged. This newspaper publisher germinate out consider this movie in call of how this group worked in project and the end making plow, which emerged by answering nine pull out questions. What is the influence of pertinent background factors on individually jurors decision making process?

juror 1 was a handler and knew the true meaning of running(a) together and in an smashing fashion. Juror 2 was a flocculent communicate follower who could be swayed by the crowd. Juror 3 stood his ground with the guilty verdict until the end because of the tear affinity with his own son. The fact that Juror 4 wore eyeglasses made him see the womans testimony of perceive the boy stab his father as she was turning everyplace in bed. He knew people who part eyeglasses do not wear them to bed. Juror 5 was minor mannered and kept his cool and was exposed to the others thoughts and opinions and lessons they taught him. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.